[NTLUG:Discuss] Some Arguments For and Against

Greg E Gregory.Edwards at usa.alcatel.com
Wed Aug 4 15:58:41 CDT 1999


Greg E wrote:
> 
> Kendall Clark wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > After reading the standard argument contra reply-to munging, I'm a bit less
> > sure now. Doh! The contra-munging argument on technical grounds is


[snip]

> >
> > Best,
> > Kendall
> > --
> > Network Solutions Inc. SUCKS!!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> 


[snip]

> 
> JMO, the logic he spouts is counter to what a mailing list is suppose to
> accomplish.
> 


[snip]

> 
> Again this is just my $0.02.
> 
> Greg E
> 
> _______________________________________________


Forgot 2 other items.

  6. if getting responses from both the list and private the originator of
     the discussion has to keep track of what portions of the discussion
     others have seen
  7. even though John in NY sent the message to the list the list is the
     actual sender and therefore the owner of the message that Jane in
     SF recieved

Sorry I'll get off my soapbox now:)

Greg E




More information about the Discuss mailing list