[NTLUG:Discuss] Some Arguments For and Against
Greg E
Gregory.Edwards at usa.alcatel.com
Wed Aug 4 15:58:41 CDT 1999
Greg E wrote:
>
> Kendall Clark wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > After reading the standard argument contra reply-to munging, I'm a bit less
> > sure now. Doh! The contra-munging argument on technical grounds is
[snip]
> >
> > Best,
> > Kendall
> > --
> > Network Solutions Inc. SUCKS!!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
>
[snip]
>
> JMO, the logic he spouts is counter to what a mailing list is suppose to
> accomplish.
>
[snip]
>
> Again this is just my $0.02.
>
> Greg E
>
> _______________________________________________
Forgot 2 other items.
6. if getting responses from both the list and private the originator of
the discussion has to keep track of what portions of the discussion
others have seen
7. even though John in NY sent the message to the list the list is the
actual sender and therefore the owner of the message that Jane in
SF recieved
Sorry I'll get off my soapbox now:)
Greg E
More information about the Discuss
mailing list