[NTLUG:Discuss] crackers

[Bobby L. Sanders]

Steve Baker wrote:

> Richard Cobbe wrote:
>
> >  Were the group to offer such a
> > service, he *highly* recommends that the group and any individuals who
> > would perform the service consult with their lawyers to get a better idea
> > of the issues involved.
>
> Funny isn't it - you NEVER hear a lawyer say "Nah - no need to consult
> with your lawyers over this matter."

Think about it.  To expect a lawyer to say such a thing would be to expect him
to commit legal malpractice on the spot.   Nearly every endeavor can have
legal consequences.  That fact that such a question was asked indicates that
the person raising the question perceived some legal implications associated
with the action.  Your best bet in this situation is to retain a lawyer to
explain those implications.  Then you can make an informed decision, if not an
intelligent one.  <<g>>

Buying into insurance company propaganda, without thinking or independent
research, is at least as vulgar as buying a brand new computer and putting
Win* on it.   IMHO.

Bobby