[NTLUG:Discuss] Suggestions requested...

[Kyle_Davenport@compusa.com]

Oh no, just tell autorpm what the server is, and any rpm's you place there will
be automatically distributed.

Check out IBM's Tivoli being ported to linux too.





David Stokes <david_stokes at yahoo.com> on 09/01/99 03:00:39 PM

Please respond to discuss at ntlug.org

To:   discuss at ntlug.org
cc:    (bcc: Kyle Davenport/Is/Corporate/CompUSA)
Subject:  Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Suggestions requested...



I was actually playing with the idea of using RPMs and autorpm for
generic system changes but never proceeded very far. An RPM full of
RPMS seems inelegant :-)

I just received a disk in the mail for CA's Unicenter for use with
Redhat, so the enterprize stuff is on the way. I'll have to spin the
disk up and see what it DOES Do but the literature makes it look like
HP Openview meets rdist.

--- MadHat <madhat at unspecific.com> wrote:
>
> OK, if I have a large number of servers, say 100+, what would be the
> best way to manage "services", users and the upgrading of daemons?
>
> I haven't seen to much on Enterprise management for Linux. (maybe
> "Enterprise management" isn't the right term.)
>
> URLs with info might be best, I don't expect hand holding, just
> ideas.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> MadHat
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>

===

-David Stokes-
david_stokes at yahoo.com


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
http://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss