[NTLUG:Discuss] [WTLUG:discuss] Quantum Computer and linux (fwd)
S Jackson
sjackson at stratmarkcorp.com
Sat Oct 23 13:34:30 CDT 1999
The theory of quantim computing is very fascinating, but Steve is
right. It is way off. Currently several simulators are being
developed, but no quantum computer (with more than 2 qubits) has ever
been produced. Once you read the superposition of the particles, you
destroy their state (this makes it difficult to get/check results). I
believe the reference in the original post is referring to a quantum
simulator based on linux. If anyone is interested in this topic (it is
actually very fascinating from a mathematical/physical standpoint) check
out www.openqubit.org. It's a group of coders, physicists, chemists,
and interested scientists who are perfecting a quantum computer
simulator, based on linux.
Jackson
Bill Jenkins wrote:
>
> On Fri, 22 Oct 1999 10:38:10 -0500 (CDT) Chad Foreman wrote:
>
> : A whole new futuristic platform is developing for Linux.
> :
> : In a newsletter I get on quantum physics applications, the Unitel company
> : has announced the prototype commercial production of a quantum computer,
> : based on the manipulation subatomic particle charges. This is related to
> : developments for a biological medium for computer circuits.
> :
> : They have contracted with the University of Illinois at Chicago to build
> : this, and the quantum logic instruction set will be developed by a UCLA prof
> : who is also an engineer in Unitel. Unitel lab tests have already been done
> : on the theoretical model.
> :
> : They announce that initially they "will use a Linux port since the Linux OS
> : is open source and easily transferred to different computing systems. Since
> : the Linux kernel is not hardware specific, it will fit Unitel's quantum
> : computer like a glove."
>
> The little bit I read about quantum computers seemed to say that
> information is signified by varying states of the electrons in the
> atoms, which are more than two. I understood the concept to be
> non-binary, which would seem to indicate an entirely new operating
> system. Infact, it would seem to require an entirely new machine
> language.
>
> Do I have it all wrong?
>
> Bill Jenkins
> bjenkins at iadfw.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss
mailing list