[NTLUG:Discuss] Punch through firewall

Jonathan Miller betaray at kludge.org
Thu Mar 2 12:32:44 CST 2000


You can either use NAT (Network Address Translation) or Port
Forwarding. Since you've got the addresses I'd say go with NAT. That'll
allow you to say 200.200.200.201 -> 192.168.1.200. Port fowarding does
exactly like it sounds like it does i.e. 200.200.200.201:80 ->
192.168.1.200:80

Information for setting up NAT with 2.2 can be found
at: http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Net-HOWTO-8.html. This is all going to
change (again!) with 2.4, but that's life.

-- Jonathan

On Thu, 2 Mar 2000, Bob Byron wrote:

> I am using Redhat 6.1 running an ipchains firewall.  
> 
> Internet ===|eth0 -- LINUX SYSTEM -- eth1|=== local network
> The local network has 168.192.1.X addresses.
> I have a machine behind a firewall that I want to access from the
> interenet.  How do I create a bridge through the firewall to that one
> machine?  Let's assume I have the domain range of 200.200.200.200 
> through 200.200.200.205, and eth0 had the address of 200.200.200.200.
> I want to use the address 200.200.200.201 to address the machine 
> behind the firewall, how would I go about that?  Ideally I want the address
> 200.200.200.201 to be translated to 192.168.1.200 (the address of the
> local machine.
> 
> Thank You,
> Bob Byron
> RAD Systems, Inc.
> www.radit.com
> (972)516-4256
> 
> 





More information about the Discuss mailing list