[NTLUG:Discuss] Under New Management :~)

MadHat madhat at unspecific.com
Mon Mar 20 09:10:42 CST 2000


Steve Baker wrote:
> 
> The post that spawned this thread wasn't *actually* a press release,
> it was a very brief note with a pointer to a press release.  I don't
> find that too objectionable - but posting the full text of the damned
> things certainly is.
> 
> As for who should or shouldn't write a FAQ, this is certainly something
> someone could do if they felt like it (I don't) - but the specific
> answer to what is on or off-topic is something that only the owner/
> moderator of a list can do.  I *could* write a set of rules - but how
> the heck would I know what's only in the minds of the moderators at this
> point.
> 
> Most lists have a 'Charter' that is separate for the FAQ.  So far,
> all we have to go on is the title of the list: NTLUG:Discuss - discussions
> about the NTLUG.  Strict interpretation of that would reduce the
> traffic to near zero I think.  Hence having a proper charter document
> would help both posters and moderators - but us mere posters cannot
> write it.

This is kind of a dead thread now.  I think we all have this under
control.  I am the new list admin/modorator/whatever.  I am working on a
Charter and a FAQ (as time permits).  For the most part, I was trying to
uphold previous "management" rules.  Right now, there really isn't a
problem and this subject is kind of getting old, so...

Just keep in mind that there are a lot of people on the list and be
kind...  simple enough.

I should have something together (the Charter and FAQ) this week, if you
think of a good question, send it to me _off_list_.

Thanks

-- 
%_=split';','f; Perl ;h;st a;o;ker;@;not;.;hac;u;her;d;ju';
print map $_{$_}, split //,
'madhat at unspecific.com'
# aka Lee Heath, but don't tell anyone.




More information about the Discuss mailing list