[NTLUG:Discuss] NTLUG Discuss Guidelines

[Daniel Shipman]

How pathetic the discussion list has become! - It was once very - very
good... now it's a bunch of crap about filters, hurt feelings, what a 12
year old should and shouldn't see, what kind of employees we should hire,
and other crap!

I suggest that another list be created "The Pathetic LUG Argument List" -
that way the rest of the list can get back to real issues.

Just my 2 cents worth



----------
> From: Chris Cox <ccox at dallas.beasys.com>
> To: discuss at ntlug.org
> Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] NTLUG Discuss Guidelines
> Date: Monday, March 27, 2000 4:50 PM
> 
> With regards the separate list ideas....
> 
> We may want to consider deprecating "discuss".
> 
> I think it's reasonable to have a "help" list, but I worry about
> changing
> the meaning of the "discuss" list if we keep that name.  Rename it,
> and I think there will less problems.
> 
> I think most people regard the "discuss" list as the "help" list.
> If a "help" list is created, my guess is that many of the
> "old discuss" list people will want to subscribe to it ...enough to even
> suggest defaulting to it in a conversion.  Perhaps the "new discuss"
> or whatever it gets named (if you like this idea) would be the
> list which people would have to sign up "new" for.
> 
> (pardon the awkward reading....hopefully I made something clear)
> 
> Just an idea,
> Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss