[NTLUG:Discuss] Re: Installing SuSe 6.4
MadHat
madhat at unspecific.com
Wed Aug 9 12:10:57 CDT 2000
"Admiral Michael H. Collins" wrote:
>
> Mandrake is not RedHat. All the packages are optimized for 586. The
> only reason I use Mandrake is that it is not RedHat. Why would one
> asssume that Mandrake is the same?
The origonal Mandrake (up to about V6.0) distro was a direct rip of
RedHat with changes of the install, like what was started by default,
and some patches here and there. They were essentially the same distro
for quite a while.
>
> I have a redhat install that runs on a 386.
>
> DrakFunn..
>
> MadHat wrote:
> >
> > "Admiral Michael H. Collins" wrote:
> > >
> > > AFAIK Mandrake will not run on a 486.
> > >
> >
> > I know RedHat will, at least up to 6.0, so Mandrake should as well,
> > unless they are using a i686 kernel for the install... I have RH
> > running on an old notebook that is a 486dx4 75MHz.
> >
--
MadHat at unspecific.com
"The 3 great virtues of a programmer:
Laziness, Impatience, and Hubris."
--Larry Wall
More information about the Discuss
mailing list