[NTLUG:Discuss] BrowseX (FAST, small browser) is outinBETA!!
Kevin Brannen
kbrannen at gte.net
Sun Oct 1 00:16:55 CDT 2000
Buddy Brannan wrote:
...
> Never mind that I think Javascript is evil and people who use it really
> should be using something else instead most of the time. ...
I used to think that Javascript was evil too, but after learning it in a
trainging class, I'm not so against it--ASSUMING it's used in a
reasonable way! I guess I'd define that as things which help the user
when done on the client side: field validation, image maps,
mouse-overs, and a few other things; but that's all. I think the reason
most of us don't like it is because it's used for too much. IMHO of
course. :-)
Besides, if you want to have a web page do something dynamic on the
client side, what else is there to use? JScript? (may it never be!)
Don't want that "evil empire" stuff! :-)
I also agree with everyone else who wrote that lack of Javascript & CSS
will hurt BrowseX's spread. I know I won't bother looking at it for
that reason.
Now if I can just find to time to get qmail working, then mutt (or
something else like it), then I can evaluate browsers and lose
Netscape(tm). I hear the team who took Mozilla and removed all the junk
but the browser come up with something good (I think it's called
"galeon").
I also loved the comment on the "selling points" page: "As TCL is
highly stable and efficient crashes are uncommon". I'll presume that
TCL crashes in an unefficient manner? :-)
Kevin
More information about the Discuss
mailing list