[NTLUG:Discuss] Javascript and CSS == Usable WWW browser?
Jeff Demel
jeff at cosmiczombie.com
Sun Oct 1 23:14:13 CDT 2000
Chris Cox wrote:
> I guess that means that text based browsing is completely dead.
Let's hope so. I can't think of a single site that I go to on a regular
basis that doesn't use at least some JavaScript or that would work at all
with a text-only browser. Hell, the last time I did text browsing was back
in '94 or '95 when all I had was a cheesy dial-up setup through school.
That was horrible. I dumped that quick.
Plus, on a text only browser you can't see porn, and isn't that what the
Internet's all about? :-)
(okay that's a joke - couldn't resist)
C.C. also wrote:
> BrowseX doesn't have the "bloat-ware" of Javascript....
How is JavaScript support bloat-ware? It's very basic, very stripped down,
and runs client-side for fast performance. Bloat comes from over use of
JavaScript by web developers, not by just being a simple browser feature.
C.C. then wrote:
>I find it hard to like Javascript AND also
> CSS. Seems the two concepts are contradictory. One is an
> attempt to centralize presentation and get it out of
> HTML, the other concentrates on presentation dynamics interspersed
> throughout HTML.
I would say they're complimentary, not contradictory. And I think maybe you
should look again at CSS because I'm not sure you quite understand what it
is or how it works. You've got it half right.
-Jeff
More information about the Discuss
mailing list