[NTLUG:Discuss] SWBell DSL

[juice@airmail.net]

Anybody know of an association attempt to allow people who have captive rent 
controlled appartments where cable companies are concerned can get help?
SWB doesn't seem to think that this tight grouping of resideces (in oakcliff( 
is important enough for dsl either. Well technically, if the pronto project 
had gotten farther along before the other LEC's realized swb was putting up 
CO's in a box that other LEC's would not have access to, swb might have gotten 
equipment close enough to me by now. I hate the idea of moving just because I 
have to choose between ISDN,  dialup V90, and a dedicated v90.

Ted B Dodd <tedbdodd at bigfoot.com> said:

> 
> I have @Home and it works fine.  It tells you that it is using 
> DHCP, but they really are static.  I have a AT&T furinished 
> modem, a $19 hub, a WIN98 box and a Linux 6.0 box on it.  I pay 
> $4.95 for the second IP.   If anyone needs help getting it set 
> up, I can share what limited info I have.

P.S. Sorry but I couldn't resist the knitpick...
Is that Redhat 6.0 or Linux 2.something?