[NTLUG:Discuss] Via Chipset
Gorwood, Steve
sgorwood at ti.com
Fri May 11 10:06:05 CDT 2001
I know that the via chipset problem with a sb live card was installed
was corrected with a BIOS change.
My understanding was that the 2.4 kernal was shipped with options set
such that dma was disabled when the via chipset was detected. Did you
change this option back to enable dma?
My question has to do with whether anyone checked that the sound blaster
bug was the same bug as they were seeing with 2.4 kernal or is there still
another bug that no one understands?
Regards,
Steven Gorwood
-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Perez [mailto:Nicholas_Perez at excite.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:32 AM
To: discuss at ntlug.org
Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Via Chipset
AFAIK, they identified the bug and corrected it in 2.4.3. because that is my
exact setup kt133 with an SBLIVE and i have seen no corruption
On Fri, 11 May 2001 05:51:05 -0500, discuss at ntlug.org wrote:
> A couple months ago there was a lot of traffic about how the 2.4 kernal
had
> data corruption problems on systems using the VIA chipset. Eventually,
they
> found that
> by disabling DMA they could avoid the problem at the cost of speed.
>
> Recently, it was announced that a bug had been identified with the VIA
KT133
> chipset when used with a Soundblaster Live sound card installed that
caused
> data corruption problems with large file transfers. What I have NOT
heard
> is anyone confirming that fixing this newly discovered bug also fixes all
> the corruption problems under the 2.4 kernal.
>
> Is it safe to turn DMA back on now that I have a fixed bios?
>
> Regards,
> Steven Gorwood
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
_______________________________________________
http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ntlug.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20010511/a2ffd94a/attachment.html
More information about the Discuss
mailing list