[NTLUG:Discuss] Evil GCC-2.96

[Steve Baker]

Kenneth Loafman wrote:
> 
> Steve Baker wrote:
> >
> > So - do you prefer 'vi' or 'emacs' ?    :-)
> 
> Ahh, a religous war brewing...
> 
> Personally, I prefer emacs over vi.  Simple reason is that I can keep
> track of a lot of heirchical keystroke assignments easier than I can
> keep track of modes.  Other peoples minds work just the opposite and can
> handle modes.  So, for sake of my sanity, I stay with emacs (actually
> xemacs).  Both are very useful environments with radically different
> interface philosophies.
> 
> I happen to run Linux under emacs, or is it the other way around?  ;-]

AAAAARRRGGGGHHHH!!!!

I was joking!  Never *EVER* start an editor email war....NEVER!

   I use 'vi' - but I know that 'emacs' is better - I just
   can never be bothered to learn it).

----------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------------
HomeMail : <sjbaker1 at airmail.net>   WorkMail: <sjbaker at link.com>
HomePage : http://web2.airmail.net/sjbaker1
Projects : http://plib.sf.net     http://tuxaqfh.sf.net  http://tuxkart.sf.net
           http://agtoys.sf.net   http://prettypoly.sf.net
           http://freeglut.sf.net http://toobular.sf.net