[NTLUG:Discuss] Re: Real dangers of CR2
Daniel Hauck
xdesign at hotmail.com
Fri Aug 10 17:38:22 CDT 2001
Obviously some of us survived and some of us didn't. That's not to say they
aren't getting around to it later though...
My brother's machine is still web-available as is mine and we are in vastly
different areas. I think they merely shut down some of the ones producing
higher traffic. It has definitely made a difference though... I am down to
only 100+ hits per day now as opposed to the previously higher rate of 500+.
(rates are guestimated, not measured and then approximated.) I hope they
don't block us all off or I will be forced to seek other alternatives in my
web hosting efforts...like running on port 8080 or 81 or something like
that... I hate non-standard ports though... it's just kinda ugly...oh
wait... :) I GOT IT!!!
To anyone wondering what do to? How about setting up HTTPS!! That's not
port 80 either!! Most people would not object to allowing a secure
connection either! The other part of the work-around would be setting up
alternative server names like "secure.domain.com" or the like as the
redirected point of service. I think that's a happy alternative for those
with a blockage of port 80.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Fred James" <fredjame at concentric.net>
To: <discuss at ntlug.org>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 3:59 PM
Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Re: Real dangers of CR2
> My attempt to access your site produced:
> >>
> This browser does not implement CSS properly. To view this site you need
> to download ia more recent browser. Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.0+ or
> Netscape 6.0+ will work fine. To view a listing of CSS-compatible
> browsers, go to http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/#browsers.
>
> In the meantime, you can read my LiveJournal here.
> <<
> I am running Netscape Communicator 4.76 - just though you would like to
> know.
>
>
> Travis Bell wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 12:49:21PM -0500, Steve Egbert wrote:
> > > I am not particularily pleased when AT&T @Home shutted port 80 off. A
brief
> > > chat with AT&T Customer Representative Staff states that this measure
is a
> > > permanent and indefinite measure.
> >
> > Am I the only AT&T @Home user who did _NOT_ get shut down? I can still
> > access my site (running on my home PC) from anywhere. All of my friends
> > can still get to it, and I can still see it from work, too.
> >
> > http://tjbell.dhs.org
> >
> > All of this days after the AT&T announcement. I don't get it...
> >
> > --
> > Travis Bell a.k.a. MudPoet
> > echo tjbexx at usa.nyz | tr xyz let
> > ICQ: 6014042 - AIM: MudPoet
> > http://tjbell.dhs.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> --
> ...make every program a filter...
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list