[NTLUG:Discuss] McKinney AT&T @home port 80 blocked

[Richard Geoffrion]

I have the @work product. It has been renamed to Business Broadband services.  Go to http://bbs.att.com/ and check it out.  (of course my wingnuts browser is crapping out on the flash detect.)

I pay $79 bucks a month for 1 static IP and server hosting capabilities.
512K download and 256K upload.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Patrick Parks 
  To: discuss at ntlug.org 
  Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 9:31 AM
  Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] McKinney AT&T @home port 80 blocked


  On Mon, 2001-08-27 at 10:58, Stephen Denny wrote:

> This port 80 blocking began about 3 weeks ago, but it doesn't seem to have 
> been universally implemented across the country yet.  AT&T did issue a 
> statement regarding it.  Sorry I don't have a link handy.
> 
> As I recall, the statement said that these ports were not needed for the 
> consumer service they were selling.  My guess is they will use this 
> opportunity to permanently block inbound port 80 (web) and 25 (mail).
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Stephen Denny
  FYI I found the link, although I do not agree with it. If I had a web server up making profit, I would agree, but a personal web server, or personal FTP or telnet is not unreasonable. Just my 2 cents.


  http://home-members.excite.com/m_policies/attrulesoftheroad.html


           ,,,,
          (O O)
+oOO-------(_)-----------+
|     Patrick Parks      |
|  www.patrickparks.com  |
|patrick at patrickparks.com|
+---------------------oOO+
       |    |    |
        |__| |__|
         ||   ||
        ooO   Ooo

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ntlug.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20010827/40fa4728/attachment.html