[NTLUG:Discuss] ...a little more on AT&T as it stands...

Bob Byron bbyron at radit.com
Fri Dec 7 18:32:18 CST 2001


Just a guess, but take a look at your DNS settings.  The only 
way I can image AT&T redirecting you to the "HowTo" page
is by making the old DNS servers redirect the domain name
there, while the new DNS servers direct you to the proper page.
What is the DNS setting on your server?

Good Luck,
Bob
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Swapan Sarkar" <swapan at yahoo.com>
To: <discuss at ntlug.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] ...a little more on AT&T as it stands...


> Do you know if AT&T is able to block MASQ/NAT traffic
> at it's DHCP server ? I am trying to access the net
> from my subnet and it is not allowing me but it allows
> the firewall server to connect to the net. So now I
> have to set all my browsers in internal network to go
> through the proxy.
> Without it, it brings up a page describing how to set
> the network address and other settings whenever I try
> to visit any site.
> 
> -swapan
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> We have several people effected adversely by the AT&T
> "no static IP" 
> rule, and so our help desk, and security people are
> taking it seriously.
> Our help desk got a response from AT&T this afternoon
> that indicated 
> that AT&T "may" think about "other service" after the
> network is stable 
> - ETA late January, first part of February, 2002. 
> Right now they are 
> just happy that it works (that is, wherever it works -
> some places 
> around the country it doesn't work at all yet).  They
> said that the 
> Dallas area went "really well" - so you can imagine
> what that means for 
> some other areas.
> Our help desk manager was on hold and online to AT&T,
> at the same time 
> today, and he said his hold time today (in two
> segments) equaled about 1 
> 1/2 hours, and his queue number on line was 700+ in
> the morning, and 
> well over 1000 in the afternoon.  He said he talked to
> the highest 
> supervisor he could, who in response to a request for
> a name, or number, 
> of someone higher to talk to, said he could only give
> out a PO box 
> address, and nothing else.No proof that isn't smoke,
> but there you have it.
> -- 
> ...make every program a filter...
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
> http://greetings.yahoo.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss





More information about the Discuss mailing list