FW: [NTLUG:Discuss] Upgrade Dependencies - RPM

[Tom Woody]

http://www.securityfocus.com/

There is a link to the Bugtraq archives the item I think mentions your issue is dated 3/26/2002

On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 08:23:05 -0600
"Rick Matthews" <RedHat.Linux at verizon.net> wrote:

> Can you point me to that information so that I can follow the
> progress?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-admin at ntlug.org [mailto:discuss-admin at ntlug.org]On
> Behalf
> Of Tom Woody
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:57 PM
> To: discuss at ntlug.org
> Subject: Re: FW: [NTLUG:Discuss] Upgrade Dependencies - RPM
> 
> 
> I just saw on Bugtraq that the RPMS mentioned here, failed because
> of a problem at RedHat...they have been notifed, so you might hold
> out for awhile and an updated RPM should be made available.
> 
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 16:19:20 -0600
> "Rick Matthews" <RedHat.Linux at verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> > I'd really appreciate it if someone could help me with my question
> > about upgrade dependencies.
> >
> > Thank you.
> > Rick Matthews
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discuss-admin at ntlug.org [mailto:discuss-admin at ntlug.org]On
> > Behalf
> > Of Rick Matthews
> > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:47 AM
> > To: Discuss at Ntlug. Org
> > Subject: [NTLUG:Discuss] Upgrade Dependencies - RPM
> >
> >
> > I've been using the Red Hat network to update my RH 7.1 box and
> have
> > been really pleased with how well it has worked. So I was
> surprised
> > a day or two ago when the update to rpm-4.0.4-7 failed.
> >
> <https://rhn.redhat.com/network/errata/errata_details.pxt?eid=1054>
> > (Updates for gnorpm, kpackage, up2date, rpmfind, and other
> packages
> > that use rpm are included as well.)
> >
> > I wanted to ask here about the appropriate action to take before
> > instead of using my normal TAM (thrashing-about-method). [I
> haven't
> > needed TAM since I started using RHN's up2date.)
> >
> > The update to perl-Perl-RPM 0.291-2 failed, stating that it
> requires
> > librpm.so.0 and librpmio.so.0. I looked up those two files on
> > rpmfind, and found that they are part of rpm-4.0.2-8.i386.
> >
> > I did an rpm files list on my rpm-4.0.2 and both of those files
> are
> > listed, but with symbolic links:
> >
> > librpm.so.0   > librpm.so.0.0.0
> > librpmio.so.0 > librpmio.so.0.0.0
> >
> > Where do I go from here?
> >
> > TIA for your assistance!
> >
> > Rick Matthews
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> --
> Tom Woody
> Systems Administrator
> NationWide Flood Research, Inc.
> phone: 214-631-0400 x209
>   fax: 214-631-0800
> 
> If you have any trouble sounding condescending,
> find a Unix user to show you how it's done.
> 		--Scott Adams
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


-- 
Tom Woody
Systems Administrator
NationWide Flood Research, Inc.
phone: 214-631-0400 x209
  fax: 214-631-0800

If you have any trouble sounding condescending,
find a Unix user to show you how it's done.
		--Scott Adams