[NTLUG:Discuss] no more reiserfs

[Chris Cox]

Paul Ingendorf wrote:
...
> Unfortunately it is the same game as reiser not a fully tested and accepted
> fs.  I can see your evangelical stance but I take it this isn't a try it and
> see for yourself type setup.

Ok.. I give up.. how many YEARS does a filesystem have to
be out to be considered "fully tested and accepted".

My guess (and I know I am right) is that ext2 was used by most of
us before it was "fully tested and accepted".

I've been using reiserfs since SuSE 6.4.

I'm not knocking ext2... I use it for small filesystems (since
journaling usually requires 30-35M).

I have certainly seen ext3 do its fair share of "funny" things
in the field.... but if someone is comfortable using it (RH stands
behind ext3 as much as SuSE stands behind reiserfs)... fine!