[NTLUG:Discuss] OT - maybe not

Wayne Dahl w.dahl4 at verizon.net
Thu Mar 6 19:28:51 CST 2003


On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 19:03, Terry Hancock wrote:

> It is still soooo bloated, though! 
> 
> Let's say I could wave my wand and make everybody use one (Linux/Open Source) 
> office suite (or more realistically, I just need to use it amongst a small 
> set of fairly cooperative people).  *Then* what would be the best? Opinions?  
> I will probably be stuck using OOo for MS interoperability, but I'd like to 
> find a good "native" suite for my own use, and so far, I've been kind of 
> frustrated by basic-feature problems (not interoperability) -- the fact that 
> OOo brings every computer I've tried it on to its knees counts as a basic 
> feature problem, IMHO. ;-)

Would you elaborate on that?  I have both Star Office 5.2 and Open
Office 1.0 on my machine and I have to say, after using both, I prefer
Open Office.  Maybe it's just a preference thing, but I don't like the
way SO is presented on one window.  I do like both ok, but lean towards
Open Office.  What do you mean it brings every computer you've tried it
on to its knees?  It works fine on mine...466MHz Intel Celeron
processor, 256 Megs P133 mem, RH 8.0 OS.

Wayne




More information about the Discuss mailing list