[NTLUG:Discuss] [ms.g@noitacude.com: [sb1116] ALERT: Texas "super DMCA" movingthrough the legislature]

[Rusty Haddock]

Kenneth Loafman wrote:
    >There is, theoretically, a Linux group that has solved this problem so 
    >you can stealth a NAT connection behind a Linux router.  I don't know 
    >where it is, but my foggy memory remembers mention of it a couple of 
    >months ago when these Super-DMCA bill started making their rounds.

I thought the same thing when I read about the sequencing of IP packets.
I mean, with a Linux router why could THOSE numbers be "fixed" as well?
The fight goes on...

	-Rusty-
-- 
   _____        Rusty Haddock  =  KD4WLZ  =  rusty at fe2o3.lonestar.org
|\/   o \   o  **Out yonder in the Van Alstyne (TX) Metropolitan Area**
|   (  -<  O o   The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck
|/\__V__/           is the day they start making vacuum cleaners.