[NTLUG:Discuss] SCO again

[terry]

Wayne Dahl wrote:

>On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 16:01, Tom Adelstein wrote:
>  
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>    
>>
>
>Is it just me or is there something wrong with Tom's emailer?  The last
>three postings I've gotten from him have all been blank.
>
>Wayne
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>.
>
>  
>
Must be just you.

I recieved the following text from the message you just replied to:
====================================================================
I didn't find anything that said SCO was backing off. I found out the 
McBride is a former litigation attorney not a Linux/UNIX guy. 
Surprising, huh?

The most recent thing he supposedly said was he found a way for Linux 
users not to break the law -- by buying SCO UnixWare binary licenses.

The following article and excerpt mentioned cases where SCO has 
completely backed off. Evidently, they dropped the BS from their web 
site in Germany. I suggest everyone read this article.

See Below:


 >Trade Practices Act Is Basis for Australian Complaint Against SCO

 >Is SCO breaking the law? Con Zymaris explains the Open Source Victoria 
 >complaint in Australia and offers advice for reporting SCO to the 
 >correct regulatory agency in your country.

Linux Journal July 29th

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7037
=============================================================================