[NTLUG:Discuss] OpenVPN
Jay Urish
j at unixwolf.net
Fri Oct 31 08:27:55 CST 2003
Whenever you get tired of trying to make that work, I have a recommendation..
I gave up on linux firewalls a few years ago because the price and
functionality of the hardware firewalls made it impossible to make money
setting them up.
For less than 15 users I use the netgear FVS-318. For more than that I spec
out the Netgear FVL-328. Both do box-to-box vpn as well as IPsec vpn for
external users...
At 08:14 AM 10/31/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>severian at pobox.com wrote:
>>Howdy,
>> I think I've given up on FreeSWAN. Has anyone here tried OpenVPN? It
>> looks like the one I'll try next. Any comments? If I can't get it
>> going this weekend, I may be looking to hire someone for a few hours who
>> can help. That's not close to a full time job, so I am not sure if that
>> posting should go here or in the NTLUG jobs list. But, I'll worry about
>> that this weekend, if I need it.
>>Good day,
>>Ralph
>
>
>What problems are you having with FreeSWAN?? I'm about to tackle that
>myself, but first I have to gen a new kernel and apply the patches that it
>needs, so I'm still at the planning phase at this point.
>
>Been looking at FreeSWAN vs OpenVPN and OpenVPN looks to be a more user
>friendly setup that runs in user space instead of OS space. Plus, it
>looks like the Windows side is easier to set up.
>
>Someone care to share personal experience with either one?
>
>My goals are (different right/left channels):
> 1) dev-to-net so we can let road-warrior developers in
> 2) user-to-net so we can let road-warrior users in
> 3) subnet-to-subnet so we can share with a sister company
>
>So security and isolation are parts of my goals. FreeSWAN has multiple
>channels in one config, and I'm not seeing that on OpenVPN. Maybe I'm
>missing a part.
>
>...Ken
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Jay Urish W5GM Systems/Network Engineer
Unixwolf Enterprises 972.691.0125 972.965.6229
http://www.unixwolf.net AIM:jayurish
More information about the Discuss
mailing list