On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 08:27, Steve Baker wrote: > Yes, it *could* be Microsoft - or someone paid by Microsoft - or even > a fairly devious Microsoft sympathiser - heck, it *could* even be SCO > themselves...but if I was a betting man, I'd be bet on idiocy over > conspiriacy every time. So you *ARE* betting on SCO!! ;) Ry