[NTLUG:Discuss] SCO History article -- no Project Monterey mention?

[terry]

Will Senn wrote:
> Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> 
>> SCO _does_ have a case against IBM, not Linux, but IBM.
>> And if SCO wins against IBM, because of the tie-in, people will
>> _ass-u-me_ that SCO has won against Linux.
>>  
>>
> Bryan,
> 
> Yes, SCO may have had a case against IBM and MS and 
> insert-whatevercompanieseverhadcontactwithsco-here, but their bungling 
> of this case, the Autozone case and their  general approach to these and 
> other issues have lost them any shred of  credibility they may have had 
> previously. Of course, that's the main reason that Ransom Love denounces 
> them.  One of SCO's many credibility problems is that it went out and 
> bought companies such as Caldera with IP (DOS related) that they could 
> sue others over - what kind of scheming evil is that? Wanna discuss the 
> merits in all of their clinical glory? Head over to http://groklaw.com, 
> mine is a near perfect state of emotionally charged logic :)
> 
> Will
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 

"One of SCO's many credibility problems is that it went out and bought 
companies such as Caldera"

I must correct you, (or maybe you miss-stated?), Caldera bought SCO and 
changed their name  [from Caldera to SCO].

-- 
but test everything; hold fast what is good,
1 Thessalonians 5:21