[NTLUG:Discuss] Re: good "book" format for html? -- DocBook is more simple, more universal

[Brian]

On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 06:55:49PM -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> I just gotta revisit this.  I'm not trying to be critical, but DocBook
> is even _simpler_ than HTML.  You focus on the structure, not the
> combined structure/format like HTML.  And it's cake to piece together.

As of a few years ago, DocBook was nothing close to being "cake to
piece together."  Is there a unified DocBook distribution of utilities
now that actually work together?  Early attempts to get DocBook up and
running were simply not worth the effort required.

  --Brian