[NTLUG:Discuss] -:0

[phrostie]

On Sat April 23 2005 06:39 pm, Paul Ingendorf wrote:
> Given this it may simply be a child process of kdm.  There may be nothing
> to worry about.
>
> Displays are named host:display so it is possible the naming of this
> process was supposed to be host:0.  For whatever reason it was unable to
> locate the hostname so it became -:0.

that  makes sense, thank you.

-----------------
You can confuse some of the people all of the time.
You can confuse all of the people some of the time.
It's setting them straight that is a bitch.