[NTLUG:Discuss] apt-get, rpm and library versioning (was: Debian)
Burton Strauss
Burton_Strauss at comcast.net
Fri Jun 24 07:53:49 CDT 2005
-----Original Message-----
From: discuss-bounces at ntlug.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at ntlug.org] On Behalf
Of Leroy Tennison
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 11:09 PM
To: NTLUG Discussion List
Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] apt-get, rpm and library versioning (was:
Debian)
Burton Strauss wrote:
<snip />
>You know, I think it's time to stop trying to simplify our life. If
SuperDuperFunction is going to be
>so much different than SuperFunction then create >another library. Yes,
this profilerates 'executables'
>but allows older code to still work without creating a 'jet-powered
stagecoach' combination of the latest
>and greatest whiz-bang features along with backwards compatibility. DASD
is getting really cheap, may
>as well use it.
Nope, that's no better.
You end up with 100s of versions of popular libraries hard linked into
programs (that's what STATIC linking does).
Then when you find a problem in, say, OpenSSL, you have to replace EVERY
single hard-linked package. Miss ONE and you are exposed to the security
problems. Dynamic linking means you only have to replace the one .so file.
-----Burton
More information about the Discuss
mailing list