[NTLUG:Discuss] AN APOLOGY to NTLUG...

[Eric Waguespack]

Well is it possible that it could have more than one purpose?

(that is a rhetorical question, of course it is)

I mean obviously the RHCE could arguable accomplish some of the following:

make $$ for redhat
give employers a way of thinning the herd
give sysadmins a way of testing themselves
help market redhat linux specifically, and linux in general

having said all that, it seems like this cert debate has been going on
in one form or another for about 10 years, does it really matter?

(another rhetorical question =), of course it doesn't)

-Eric, RHCE, RHCT, CCNP, CCNP/Voice, CCDP, CCNA, CCDA, LPIC-1, MCSE:
NT4.0, MCP+I, Linux+, Security+, Network+, i-Net+, Server+, A+, IBM
CS: AS/400, CNX: Ethernet



On 1/3/06, Thomas Cameron <thomas.cameron at camerontech.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 09:43 -0600, David Mandala wrote:
> > We can agree to disagree. The Redhat cert is sinply a way for Redhat to
> > make cash off of the backs of folks.
>
> Wow.  I guess CIO Insight
> (http://www.cioinsight.com/article2/0,1540,1902318,00.asp) and
> Certcities.com (http://certcities.com/editorial/features/story.asp?
> EditorialsID=95) are just deluded.
>
> Thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>