[NTLUG:Discuss] 4.5TB volume formats out to 95Gig *Half-way solved*
Richard Geoffrion
ntlug at rain4us.net
Thu Sep 7 18:20:50 CDT 2006
Richard Geoffrion wrote:
> Richard wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>>
>> The new 4.5TB array is built and
>> configured as an LVM volume and I'm only seeing 95Gigs!
>>
>>
> Well, it appears that I'm gonna have to use 'parted' and use the new GPT
> (GUID Partition Tables). ...more to come...
>
>
Maybe ext2/3 has a limitation!?!
Help from
http://www.gnu.org/software/parted/manual/html_chapter/parted_7.html#SEC67
seemed to be the key, but I had some strange results. After following
the instructions and creating my 'pv' on /dev/sdg the 'vg' showed that
it was 4.1TB.
PV /dev/sdg VG prepress lvm2 [4.09 TB / 0 free]
So I formatted it with the command:
mke2fs -j -L PrepressDrive -O dir_index,has_journal,sparse_super -T
largefile /dev/prepress/drive
But after I mounted it, df still only showed 96gig.
/dev/mapper/prepress-drive 95G 33M 91G 1% /prepress
So I unmounted it and formatted /dev/prepress/drive with reiserfs. What
do you know! it sees all of the space!!!!!
/dev/mapper/prepress-drive 4.1T 33M 4.1T 1% /prepress
So....I recreated the LVM volume on /dev/sdg1 (the partition created
with 'parted') and formatted it with ext2 -- NO JOY! Only 96Gig.
Further research seems to show that EXT2/3 has a 4TB limit. But why the
96GB???--space left over between the ext2/3 limit and the end of the
disk space?
So my questions now are...
1) What filesystem SHOULD I use? After reading some evil stuff about
ReiserFS...I'm wary. (metadata vs block journaling)
2) If I'm using LVM, do I even NEED to partition the drive to see
greater than 2TB? What is it on the system that determines the operating
system's ability to use the drive space?
3) Any good hints on how to fill up and test 4TB of space to verify data
integrity won't be compromised by something like ..say....a "drive wrap"?
--
Richard
'time to make the doughnuts'
More information about the Discuss
mailing list