[NTLUG:Discuss] Networking problem (was Invisible cursor)
Leroy Tennison
leroy_tennison at prodigy.net
Sat Oct 14 23:53:56 CDT 2006
tophatjames at yahoo.com wrote:
> Update the BIOS, then update FC5 to the latest. The BIOS will let this particular board start to work, but until you also update the O/S, it is still flaky.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Douglas Scott" <dcscott1 at comcast.net>
> To: "NTLUG Discussion List" <discuss at ntlug.org>
> Sent: 10/13/06 9:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Networking problem (was Invisible cursor)
>
> On Thursday 12 October 2006 8:52 am, Wayne Walker wrote:
>
>> read the man page for your video card driver. Most of them have an
>>
> ...
>
>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 08:38:55AM -0500, Douglas Scott wrote:
>>
>>> I've got an unusual problem. I just installed Suse 10.1 on a new
>>> computer I just built and I can't see the cursor. It's there. Icons
>>>
> ...
>
> Thanks for the tip. That worked. Now I can finally look into the other big
> issue I have with the machine, namely the networking. The machine duel boots
> into the other OS and networking, including DHCP, works fine there, so it's
> not a hardware issue.
>
> The network card appears to be detected but DHCP could never get an address
> back from the server. I finally gave up on that and went to a static
> address. ifconfig shows I have the address. Running status on the network
> service shows it is running. And running route shows that routing is setup
> correctly. However route takes it's time reporting this. It seems to hang
> for about 20 seconds twice during the listing. Once when it lists
> 192.168.1.0 and once when it lists the default line.
>
> Actually this is the 3rd install on this machine. While waiting to download a
> copy of the Suse 10.1 64 DVD I installed Suse Enterprise Edition 10 and
> Fedora Core 5, both of which I had sitting around from magazines. I noticed
> that both also had trouble with the network.
>
> I had assumed that I needed to get a driver for the system. The motherboard,
> is an Asus A8N-VM/CSM, which has an nVidia chipset. The ethernet controller
> is an MCP51 and is built into the MB. The MB came with a disk that includes
> Linux drivers on it, but running the program results in an error. I checked
> the nVidia web site and they recommend Suse users should use Yast to upgrade.
> Of course that rather requires getting the network to work first.
>
> The module that the network card should be using is forcedeth and this is
> present and lsmod shows that it is loaded.
>
> So I am out of ideas. Any suggestions.
>
> Doug
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> .
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
I've never heard of the brand of Ethernet controller you have on your
motherboard. I'm actually surprised that it isn't a SIS chip such as a
900. In this situation it may be easier to do an "end run" around the
problem. You can get 3Com 3C90x (typically 3C905, try to get a 905B or
higher) cards at 1st/3rd Saturday for $5 or less. At that price it's
worth picking up a couple. It's a well-known card by a major vendor and
you shouldn't have any trouble with it. I'm running a 3C905B on CentOS
4.3 and have used them with various SuSE/Fedora/Red Hat distributions.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list