[NTLUG:Discuss] Saturday's meeting topic?

[Eric Waguespack]

I for one am going to stick with ext3, and then ext4 when it is
stable, when it comes to file systems I'll take reliability over speed
anytime.

On 10/22/06, Leroy Tennison <leroy_tennison at prodigy.net> wrote:
> Chris Cox wrote:
> > Wayne Walker wrote:
> >
> >> I could talk about VMware Workstation and Server if anyone's interested.
> >> My trip to the Ruby conference got cancelled, so I should make
> >> tomorrow's meeting.
> >>
> >
> > My benchmark discussion will be short... maybe both of us present?
> >
> > My results are for reiserfs (v3), jfs, ext3, ext2 and xfs  using
> > 4G, 10G and 50G file loads under bonnie++.
> >
> >
> >> Wayne
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 07:47:53AM -0500, Michael Barnes wrote:
> >>
> >>> Was there ever a decision made on the topic for tomorrow?
> >>>
> >>> Just wondering,
> >>> Michael
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >>>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> I wish I could have made it but I had a long weekend at work.  Is there
> a posting of the presentation?
>
> Also, with all the  remarks about Reiserfs killing things, I'm wondering
> about reliability as well.  It's nice to have speed but something that
> speedily trashes you data isn't a solution.  I found a hit on the Web
> which was a copy of a SuSE administration guide which basically stated
> that Reiserfs, JFS and XFS all journaled metadata only and thus the data
> itself was at risk.  Is ext3 the only file system capable of journaling
> both?
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>