[NTLUG:Discuss] Software RAID NAS Box
Daniel Hauck
daniel at yacg.com
Tue Sep 11 20:30:26 CDT 2007
Okay, a little background:
I've got this old box from the office... a server with a failed drive
that is way out of warranty and will not be used by the business for
anything. So what do I do with this? New toy!
This box is an iomega NAS box. It came with Windows 2000 installed and
4 123GB drives where a small amount of each partition was set up for the
OS and the rest of the HD space was configured as a software RAID5.
Fairly simple. The hardware is a relatively simple system board with
on-board video, 512MB RAM, floppy controller, two IDE ports and all
that. The system board also has a HighPoint IDE RAID controller which
is really just another software RAID which means two more IDE
controllers with the expectation that software RAID drivers will be used
on them... so yeah, 4 IDE ports. This device also has some strange
little device to interface the IDE ports to these removable drive trays.
(Interestingly, it interferes with trying to attach IDE devices
addressed as "slave" somehow...) Finally, there's two 10/100 ethernet
ports and a PCI slot with a riser and an Adaptec SCSI RAID card. (not in
use)
So I want to do this under Linux (of course) and I bought 4 400GB drives
from outpost.com. (They're pretty cheap... ) I'm going to install
CentOS on the box with the intent of using it as a means of serving up
FTP, SMB and NFS services. I'm giving some thought to how I might set
up the partitioning and all that. Initially, I'm just thinking of
mimicking the previous scheme when it was running under Win2K. In this
case, each drive will have the same partition scheme:
100MB /boot,
2GB {swap},
4000MB /
*everything else* /data
The non-swap partitions should be RAID where /data would be a RAID5 and
the other two RAID1. CentOS didn't issue any complaints when I wanted
to set everything up as RAID and then set the actual /boot, / and /data
partitions up in the Linux software RAID. I think the installation
failed while files were copying because of a bad install DVD... (I'll
check it in a bit and burn another one if needed)
Okay, so I'm soliciting comments and better ideas..?
More information about the Discuss
mailing list