[NTLUG:Discuss] NAS devices
Chris Cox
cjcox at acm.org
Tue Jul 8 11:39:45 CDT 2008
MadHat Unspecific wrote:
> Ralph wrote:
>> Howdy,
>> I get to spec out and probably buy a NAS for the office. I see some 2
>> U servers that have 8 exposed 2.5 inch drive bays. When I think of 2.5
>> inch hard drives, I don't think of drives that can take heavy use. Are
>> these new drives built better than laptop drives? Is SAS better than
>> SATA? SAS drives seem to go up to 146 GIG and SATA up to 500 GIG. At
>> least, that is what Pogo Linux says. I don't need huge amounts of
>> throughput. But, reliability is very important. Any comments?
>
> I can only speak from personal experience. I do IT consulting and I
> have installed several 1U servers for clients over the past few years.
> I have seen more and more starting to use the 2.5" drives. They can fit
> 3-4 drives in the 1U to use RAID 5, where before it would only hold 2
> drives. In the time I have used these, I have only had 1 drive fail out
> of 50 or so. The speed and size of these drives has seemed fine. I was
> shocked when I first saw them as well, but have been happy with the lack
> of issues I have seen.
>
>
BUT, in all fairness Lee, they haven't been around long enough.
I mean, how old are you oldest 2.5" SAS based units? (they'll be Sun
boxes since they were the first to deploy)
I think we need another year or two before I'll say anything about
their reliability over 3.5" SCSI.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list