[NTLUG:Discuss] FAT32 no longer supported FS???

[./aal]

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Gilbert Morrow <gkfmorrow at gmail.com> wrote:
> what is CONFIG_FAT_FS set to?  Y or N
> what is CONFIG_VFAT_FS set to?  Y or N
> Shouldn't that be (=m)
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 1:20 PM, ./aal <al_h at technologist.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Gilbert Morrow <gkfmorrow at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I have a 40gb drive from a old laptop that I bought a enclosure for and
>> use
>> > , never had a problem with it auto mounting FAT32 formatted file system
>> in
>> > SuSE .
>> > What is the device ID ?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Stephen Davidson <
>> > gorky at freenet.carleton.ca> wrote:
>> >
>> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> >> Hash: SHA1
>> >>
>> >> Greetings.
>> >>
>> >> Jan 31 11:33:28 sda64 kernel: FAT: "fat=32" option is obsolete, not
>> >> supported now
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> zgrep FAT /proc/config.gz
>>
>> what is CONFIG_FAT_FS set to?  Y or N
>> what is CONFIG_VFAT_FS set to?  Y or N
>>
>>
>> which kernel are you booting?  (uname -r)
>>
>> do your sources match? (ls -l /usr/src/linux)
>>
>>
>> --

or M
I did forget that option

if it is M, is the module loaded?
perhaps it needs to be set to autoload, the upgrade may have confused modules



-- 
I'm a PC(x86 AND ppc)
AND I RUN LINUX!!!
Linux is like ice cream. It comes in many flavors and everyone has
their favorite, but we all get the same smile regardless of which we
choose to scoop.
H. L. Mencken  - "The government consists of a gang of men exactly
like you and me. They have, taking one with...