[NTLUG:Discuss] MS Windows vs. Linux Trace Route
Rick Renshaw
bofh69 at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 24 18:02:30 CDT 2010
>----- Original Message ----
>From: Carl Haddick <sysmail at glade.net>
>To: NTLUG Discussion List <discuss at ntlug.org>
>Sent: Thu, June 24, 2010 12:22:09 PM
>Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] MS Windows vs. Linux Trace Route
>-----Original Message-----
>From: discuss-bounces at ntlug.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at ntlug.org] On Behalf
>Of Jay Urish
>Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:23 AM
>To: NTLUG Discussion List
>Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] MS Windows vs. Linux Trace Route
>On 6/24/2010 9:24 AM, Dennis Rice wrote:
>> At the school that I am now teaching Linux at has a situation that I
>> have not seen before.
>>
>> Using a M$ Windows system I am able to perform a tracert from the
>> command line in the lab. When I use the Linux (Fedora 12) system,
>> traceroute does not work beyond the internal routers, but mtr does. I
>> typically do a tracert to yahoo.com.
>>
>> Anyone have thoughts on why?
>>
>> Dennis
>You might try traceroute -I www.yahoo.com.
>Traceroute by default uses UDP packets, the -I switch causes it to use pings
>(ICMP).
>No telling what Winders uses, and it could be the traceroute UDP is being
>blocked at your router.
>Good luck,
>Carl
According to http://www.microsoft.com/resources/documentation/windows/xp/all/proddocs/en-us/tracert.mspx?mfr=true MS tracert uses ICMP echo request packets, which is a ping.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list