[NTLUG:Discuss] delaying eth1 initializatio [was: which one is eth0, and which one is eth1?

Michael H. Collins mhtexcollins at austin.rr.com
Fri Jul 14 07:55:41 CDT 2000


	I have never seen the 3c509-0 thing. It will not find a module by that
name since there is none.  I never put anything about the module in the
options line.  I think you are totally confusing it.

m m wrote:
> 
> Thanks Mark and all:
> 
> I fond the problem why the eth1 did not be displayed. there was a mistake in
> the /etc/conf.midule.
> Now, I have new problem! these two NIC don't work now! these NIC are 3com
> 3c509
> in the /dev/conf.modules
> alias eth0 3c509
> alias eth1 3c509
> options eth0 -o 3c509-0 io=0x300 irq=10
> options eth1 -o 3c509-1 io=0x340 irq=7 (or 15, have tried both)
> 
>
-- 
Michael H. Collins			http://www.linuxlink.com	
Admiral of OpenSourcery			Penguinista Navy
All Things French..                     Mandrake and XFCE
Fun with the Austin Linux group 	http://www.austinlug.org
Need a Real Texas Radio Fix?		http://www.kut.org




More information about the Discuss mailing list