[NTLUG:Discuss] Evil GCC-2.96

[Daniel Hauck]

Actually, in RH7, kgcc was necessary.  But in RH7.1, I don't think I've ever
had to modify the makefile so "gcc" is working there in that case.

----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Cox <cjcox at acm.org>
To: <discuss at ntlug.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Evil GCC-2.96


> I'm not a RH 7.1 user, but I believe they tell you the kernel
> has to be compiled with kgcc (a supported gcc) instead of
> the default non supported (except by RH of course) one.
>
> Will Senn wrote:
> >
> > Christopher Browne wrote:
> >
> > "Evil" though the GCC 2.96 issue may be (sic)...
> >
> > What do you mean?  I am running RedHat 7.1 and I have noticed that it is
> > VERY difficult to successfully compile a kernel.  I seem to have no
problems
> > with other builds - just the kernel and modules.  Does this Evil 2.96
have
> > something to do with it?
> >
> > Eagerly awaiting answer to life's question (and this one :)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Will
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>