[NTLUG:Discuss] non professional people
James Coffer
jcoffer at swbell.net
Tue Aug 7 22:26:50 CDT 2001
to many non professional people is on here claimming to know something
about computer But never have showed me any thing as of yet
so Just cut me loose from you non professional people
James
At 12:01 PM 8/7/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Send Discuss mailing list submissions to
> discuss at ntlug.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> discuss-request at ntlug.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> discuss-admin at ntlug.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Discuss digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Samba Configuration (David Wilson)
> 2. Re: Samba Configuration (Jay Urish)
> 3. Re: Samba Configuration (Chris Cox)
> 4. Re: Samba Configuration (Daniel Hauck)
> 5. Re: Samba Configuration (David WIlson)
> 6. Re: Samba Configuration (George Lass)
> 7. ftpaccess (Gregory L. Camp)
> 8. Re: Samba Configuration (Greg Hewett)
> 9. Covad files for chapter 11. (Elequin)
> 10. RE: ftpaccess (Cox, Chris)
> 11. RE: ftpaccess (Cox, Chris)
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 1
>From: "David Wilson" <dwilsonn at home.com>
>To: <discuss at ntlug.org>
>Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 22:38:18 -0500
>Subject: [NTLUG:Discuss] Samba Configuration
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C11EC8.7D14EB60
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>I have having a difficult time getting Samba configured. I am running =
>RH 7.1 I have used SWAT to configure the smb.conf file. Testparm =
>checks ok, Samba Status shows to be running. I can smbclient -L to =
>other hosts, I just can not see my machine from my WinMe, Win98 network =
>neighborhood. Any suggestions?
>
>When I do manage to see it, how do I share an ODBC database via Samba?
>
>Thanks
>
>David Wilson
>
>------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C11EC8.7D14EB60
>Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4616.200" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have having a difficult time getting =
>Samba=20
>configured. I am running RH 7.1 I have used SWAT to =
>configure the=20
>smb.conf file. Testparm checks ok, Samba Status shows to be=20
>running. I can smbclient -L to other hosts, I just can =
>not see=20
>my machine from my WinMe, Win98 network neighborhood. Any=20
>suggestions?</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>When I do manage to see it, how =
>do I share an=20
>ODBC database via Samba?</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>David Wilson</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
>
>------=_NextPart_000_001B_01C11EC8.7D14EB60--
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 22:48:12 -0500
>To: discuss at ntlug.org
>From: Jay Urish <j at yourlinuxguru.com>
>Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Samba Configuration
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>first of all,
>forget swat.. It sucks..
>To have a really kick ass Samba server, you need to hand edit the file.
>
>check out www.samba.org for more details..
>
>here is a url
>http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html
>
>At 10:38 PM 8/6/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>>I have having a difficult time getting Samba configured. I am running RH
>>7.1 I have used SWAT to configure the smb.conf file. Testparm checks ok,
>>Samba Status shows to be running. I can smbclient -L to other hosts, I
>>just can not see my machine from my WinMe, Win98 network
>>neighborhood. Any suggestions?
>>
>>When I do manage to see it, how do I share an ODBC database via Samba?
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>David Wilson
>
>
>Jay Urish
>Your Linux Guru.
>Sendmail/Bind/Apache/DHCPD/IPchains/Samba expertise all in one place!
>www.yourlinuxguru.com
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 22:52:36 -0500
>From: Chris Cox <cjcox at acm.org>
>Organization: North Texas Linux Users Group
>To: discuss at ntlug.org
>Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Samba Configuration
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>Make sure nmbd is running (Netbios).
>Check the log.nmb.
>What host was the browse master when you did a smbclient -L?
>Did you show up in that list?
>What WORKGROUP is the Linux box in? Have you tried looking
>at the Entire Network in the Network Neighborhood?
>
>And of course... are the Windows hosts configured to use
>TCP/IP networking.
>
>Just some things to look at...
>Chris
>
>> David Wilson wrote:
>>
>> I have having a difficult time getting Samba configured. I am running
RH 7.1 I have
>> used SWAT to configure the smb.conf file. Testparm checks ok, Samba
Status shows to be
>> running. I can smbclient -L to other hosts, I just can not see my
machine from my
>> WinMe, Win98 network neighborhood. Any suggestions?
>>
>> When I do manage to see it, how do I share an ODBC database via Samba?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David Wilson
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 4
>From: "Daniel Hauck" <xdesign at hotmail.com>
>To: <discuss at ntlug.org>
>Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Samba Configuration
>Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 23:11:01 -0500
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0233_01C11ECD.0FECF140
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>I've had a lot more luck editing by hand... do that.
>
>ODBC isn't anything to do with SMB... they are totally unrelated though I
>can see the beginnings of your confusion. I have some experience with ODBC
>because I was setting up a Coldfusion server under Linux and the only
>options were two commercial SQLs and after immense pressure, ODBC support
>was added. Without further ado... http://www.unixodbc.com/ <-- the URL is
>surprising and hard to remember I know.... but go there for a good start.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Wilson
> To: discuss at ntlug.org
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:38 PM
> Subject: [NTLUG:Discuss] Samba Configuration
>
>
> I have having a difficult time getting Samba configured. I am running RH
>7.1 I have used SWAT to configure the smb.conf file. Testparm checks ok,
>Samba Status shows to be running. I can smbclient -L to other hosts, I
>just can not see my machine from my WinMe, Win98 network neighborhood. Any
>suggestions?
>
> When I do manage to see it, how do I share an ODBC database via Samba?
>
> Thanks
>
> David Wilson
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0233_01C11ECD.0FECF140
>Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
><HTML><HEAD>
><META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
>charset=3Diso-8859-1">
><META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4616.200" name=3DGENERATOR>
><STYLE></STYLE>
></HEAD>
><BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
><DIV><FONT face=3D"ＭＳ =
>Ｐゴシック" size=3D2>I've had a lot more =
>luck editing by hand... do=20
>that.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D"ＭＳ =
>Ｐゴシック" size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
><DIV><FONT face=3D"ＭＳ =
>Ｐゴシック" size=3D2>ODBC isn't anything =
>to do with SMB... they are=20
>totally unrelated though I can see the beginnings of your =
>confusion. I=20
>have some experience with ODBC because I was setting up a Coldfusion =
>server=20
>under Linux and the only options were two commercial SQLs and after =
>immense=20
>pressure, ODBC support was added. Without further ado... <A=20
>href=3D"http://www.unixodbc.com/">http://www.unixodbc.com/</A> <-=
>- the URL=20
>is surprising and hard to remember I know.... but go there for a =
>good=20
>start.</FONT></DIV>
><DIV> </DIV>
><BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
>style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
>BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt ＭＳ =
>Ｐゴシック">----- Original Message ----- =
></DIV>
> <DIV=20
> style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt ＭＳ =
>Ｐゴシック; font-color: =
>black"><B>From:</B>=20
> <A title=3Ddwilsonn at home.com href=3D"mailto:dwilsonn at home.com">David =
>Wilson</A>=20
> </DIV>
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt ＭＳ =
>Ｐゴシック"><B>To:</B> <A =
>title=3Ddiscuss at ntlug.org=20
> href=3D"mailto:discuss at ntlug.org">discuss at ntlug.org</A> </DIV>
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt ＭＳ =
>Ｐゴシック"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, August =
>06, 2001 10:38=20
> PM</DIV>
> <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt ＭＳ =
>Ｐゴシック"><B>Subject:</B> =
>[NTLUG:Discuss] Samba=20
> Configuration</DIV>
> <DIV><BR></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have having a difficult time =
>getting Samba=20
> configured. I am running RH 7.1 I have used SWAT to =
>configure the=20
> smb.conf file. Testparm checks ok, Samba Status shows to =
>be=20
> running. I can smbclient -L to other hosts, I just =
>can not=20
> see my machine from my WinMe, Win98 network neighborhood. =
>Any=20
> suggestions?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>When I do manage to see it, how =
>do I share=20
> an ODBC database via Samba?</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks</FONT></DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>David=20
>Wilson</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
>
>------=_NextPart_000_0233_01C11ECD.0FECF140--
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 09:09:42 -0500 (CDT)
>Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Samba Configuration
>From: "David WIlson" <davidw at 1lsn.com>
>To: <discuss at ntlug.org>
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>Look in your smb.conf file and maker sure you have the following line
entered:
>
> encrypt passwords = yes
>
>in you global definition, windows needs to see this line to connect...
>
>by the way, nice name...
>
>David Wilson
>
>> I have having a difficult time getting Samba configured. I am running
>> RH 7.1 I have used SWAT to configure the smb.conf file. Testparm
>> checks ok, Samba Status shows to be running. I can smbclient -L to
>> other hosts, I just can not see my machine from my WinMe, Win98
>> network neighborhood. Any suggestions?
>>
>> When I do manage to see it, how do I share an ODBC database via Samba?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David Wilson
>
>
>___________________________________________________
>This email was sent using Lindsey Systems Networks.
> "The most innovative ISP on the Web!"
> http://lindseysystems.com/
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2001 09:23:07 -0500
>From: George Lass <George.Lass at osc.com>
>To: discuss at ntlug.org
>Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Samba Configuration
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>David Wilson wrote:
>>
>> I have having a difficult time getting Samba configured. I am running
>> RH 7.1 I have used SWAT to configure the smb.conf file. Testparm
>> checks ok, Samba Status shows to be running. I can smbclient -L to
>> other hosts, I just can not see my machine from my WinMe,
>> Win98 network neighborhood. Any suggestions?
>>
>> When I do manage to see it, how do I share an ODBC database via
>> Samba?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David Wilson
>
>If you think your samba config is OK you may want to try locating the
>server from your windoze PC via start/find/computer/named and then enter
>the ip *address* in the box.
>
>George
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 7
>From: "Gregory L. Camp" <Greg.Camp at osc.com>
>To: "NT Linux User Group (E-mail)" <discuss at ntlug.org>
>Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:05:12 -0500
>Subject: [NTLUG:Discuss] ftpaccess
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>I'm running RH6.0 and wu-ftpd 6.0.0-14.6x (RPM from RedHat). I'm trying to
>configure ftpd to use only certain ports for passive transfers (so I can
>limit what is mapped in the firewall). From the man page, I'm using this
>line in /etc/ftpaccess:
>
>passive ports 0.0.0.0/0 5301 5303
>
>That is *supposed* to limit the range of ports to 5301, 5302 and 5303.
>However, ftpd seems to keep sending different ports on the control line.
>
>I've also tried changing other values in ftpaccess just to make certain the
>file is being read upon startup. Those changes always work, just like
>they're suppose to!
>
>Has anyone else experienced this? Did I misread the man page? Any ideas?
>
>Greg
>Greg.Camp at osc.com
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:11:37 -0500 (CDT)
>Subject: Re: [NTLUG:Discuss] Samba Configuration
>From: "Greg Hewett" <ghewett at d-techcorp.com>
>To: discuss at ntlug.org
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>You're crazy... there is no difference in swat and "man smb.conf." Swat is
>a great tool to use if you need the doc handy.
>
>
>> first of all,
>> forget swat.. It sucks..
>> To have a really kick ass Samba server, you need to hand edit the file.
>>
>> check out www.samba.org for more details..
>>
>> here is a url
>> http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html
>>
>> At 10:38 PM 8/6/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>>>I have having a difficult time getting Samba configured. I am running
>>>RH 7.1 I have used SWAT to configure the smb.conf file. Testparm
>>>checks ok, Samba Status shows to be running. I can smbclient -L to
>>>other hosts, I just can not see my machine from my WinMe, Win98
>>>network
>>>neighborhood. Any suggestions?
>>>
>>>When I do manage to see it, how do I share an ODBC database via Samba?
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>David Wilson
>>
>>
>> Jay Urish
>> Your Linux Guru.
>> Sendmail/Bind/Apache/DHCPD/IPchains/Samba expertise all in one place!
>> www.yourlinuxguru.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 9
>From: "Elequin" <elequin at abyssal.org>
>To: <discuss at ntlug.org>
>Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:42:46 -0500
>Subject: [NTLUG:Discuss] Covad files for chapter 11.
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>Related to recent posts about DSL ISPs surviving...
>
>http://www.usatoday.com/money/tech/2001-08-07-covad-bankruptcy.htm
>
> - Eric
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 10
>From: "Cox, Chris" <Chris_Cox at stercomm.com>
>To: "'discuss at ntlug.org'" <discuss at ntlug.org>
>Subject: RE: [NTLUG:Discuss] ftpaccess
>Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:48:58 -0500
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>I have never done this (and I apologize for the Outlook post)...
>
>But I think you made need a hyphen between the port numbers
>5301-5303
>
>(it's a guess... but I saw this in some other Usenet posts)
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: discuss-admin at ntlug.org [mailto:discuss-admin at ntlug.org]On Behalf
>Of Gregory L. Camp
>Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:05 AM
>To: NT Linux User Group (E-mail)
>Subject: [NTLUG:Discuss] ftpaccess
>
>
>I'm running RH6.0 and wu-ftpd 6.0.0-14.6x (RPM from RedHat). I'm trying to
>configure ftpd to use only certain ports for passive transfers (so I can
>limit what is mapped in the firewall). From the man page, I'm using this
>line in /etc/ftpaccess:
>
>passive ports 0.0.0.0/0 5301 5303
>
>That is *supposed* to limit the range of ports to 5301, 5302 and 5303.
>However, ftpd seems to keep sending different ports on the control line.
>
>I've also tried changing other values in ftpaccess just to make certain the
>file is being read upon startup. Those changes always work, just like
>they're suppose to!
>
>Has anyone else experienced this? Did I misread the man page? Any ideas?
>
>Greg
>Greg.Camp at osc.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>--__--__--
>
>Message: 11
>From: "Cox, Chris" <Chris_Cox at stercomm.com>
>To: "'discuss at ntlug.org'" <discuss at ntlug.org>
>Subject: RE: [NTLUG:Discuss] ftpaccess
>Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 11:08:00 -0500
>Reply-To: discuss at ntlug.org
>
>I think that was a bad guess... looks like the format
>you are using already is correct.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: discuss-admin at ntlug.org [mailto:discuss-admin at ntlug.org]On Behalf
>Of Cox, Chris
>Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:49 AM
>To: 'discuss at ntlug.org'
>Subject: RE: [NTLUG:Discuss] ftpaccess
>
>
>I have never done this (and I apologize for the Outlook post)...
>
>But I think you made need a hyphen between the port numbers
>5301-5303
>
>(it's a guess... but I saw this in some other Usenet posts)
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: discuss-admin at ntlug.org [mailto:discuss-admin at ntlug.org]On Behalf
>Of Gregory L. Camp
>Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:05 AM
>To: NT Linux User Group (E-mail)
>Subject: [NTLUG:Discuss] ftpaccess
>
>
>I'm running RH6.0 and wu-ftpd 6.0.0-14.6x (RPM from RedHat). I'm trying to
>configure ftpd to use only certain ports for passive transfers (so I can
>limit what is mapped in the firewall). From the man page, I'm using this
>line in /etc/ftpaccess:
>
>passive ports 0.0.0.0/0 5301 5303
>
>That is *supposed* to limit the range of ports to 5301, 5302 and 5303.
>However, ftpd seems to keep sending different ports on the control line.
>
>I've also tried changing other values in ftpaccess just to make certain the
>file is being read upon startup. Those changes always work, just like
>they're suppose to!
>
>Has anyone else experienced this? Did I misread the man page? Any ideas?
>
>Greg
>Greg.Camp at osc.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>_______________________________________________
>http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>--__--__--
>
>_______________________________________________
>Discuss mailing list
>Discuss at ntlug.org
>http://www.ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>End of Discuss Digest
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list