[NTLUG:Discuss] database(s) on Linux
iostream@attbi.com
iostream at attbi.com
Thu Oct 3 12:35:26 CDT 2002
As an IT employee of Blockbuster, I can assure you, that
overhead does save us money versus some of the pre Oracle
manual processes. Where do you get your figures from?
Jusitn
> Quoting iostream at attbi.com:
>
> >
> > <snip>
> > > > If Oracle, Sybase, or Informix had a reasonable price tag OSS
> > products
> > > > like MySQL and PostgresSQL wouldn't have a following.
> > >
> > > No argument from me.
> > >
> > > Ry
> >
> > That is not entirely true. The feature set of Oracle is required for
> > many things, and corporations will gladly spend the money on such
> > features. I doubt you will see many people trying to run a multi TB
> > data warehouse with any OSS tool, or a CRM datamart, etc. Many
> > companies use these expensive database systems to do mission critical
> > work. The databases save more than enough in operational costs, or
> > create enough extra revenue to easily justify the pricetag. Lets face
> > it, if you are buying million dollar + servers, Oracle licensing fees
> > are not going to bankrupt you.
> >
> > Justin
> >
>
> I have to ask, do you work for Oracle Justin? At the current price of Oracle
> because it is so expensive it is beneficial and truly cost effective to maybe
> 10,000 businesses. So at its cost you would consider it a bargain for those
> companies. What about the other 2.5 million companies in the United States
> alone that are out there? This is exactly what Greg was addressing by
> contending that if the prices were reasonable for Oracle, Sybase or even
> Informix the various open source solutions would not have the following they
> have today. How exactly is this not entirely true?
>
> Also don't think that the licensing fees are the only costs involved in working
> with these dbs. Their complexity leads to expensive DBAs to manage, more
> expensive people to develop in them, per processor fees for bug fixes disguised
> as upgrades. All of these lead up to price tags for total cost of ownership
> that choke companies like Blockbuster and GM yearly. How is some small to mid
> sized business supposed to handle a nut as large as $800k to get a custom order
> management system with a web interface just so they can integrate store sales
> and internet sales?
>
> I don't mean for this to be so inflammatory Justin but really you just attacked
> a perfectly good point while you yourself were walking on water with your own
> ethnocentric viewpoint totally ignoring the fact that the majority of companies
> cannot afford oracle or the hidden costs that come along with it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
More information about the Discuss
mailing list