[NTLUG:Discuss] database(s) on Linux
Greg Edwards
greg at nas-inet.com
Thu Oct 3 21:40:48 CDT 2002
Rev. wRy wrote:
> Greg Edwards wrote:
>
>> I didn't see much in the way of specific issues mentioned in these
>> articles. Personally I don't have any real issues with not having
>> transactions, views, or subselects. But then again I do mostly
>> systems development and I don't want users writting SQL anyway.
>
>
> Point being if you are running Oracle and using views, transactions, and
> subselects, mysql probably wouldn't cut it for you. Hence my initial
> comments.
>
>> If Oracle, Sybase, or Informix had a reasonable price tag OSS products
>> like MySQL and PostgresSQL wouldn't have a following.
>
>
> No argument from me.
>
> Ry
>
I agree about mysql not being the right tool if your doing a port.
However, on a new design or redesign project I wouldn't rule out mysql
unless your letting users roll their own SQL.
--
Greg Edwards
New Age Software, Inc.
http://www.nas-inet.com
More information about the Discuss
mailing list