[NTLUG:Discuss] Timestamp question
Rusty Haddock
rusty at fe2o3.lonestar.org
Sun Mar 9 11:56:05 CST 2003
Jack Snodgrass wrote:
>On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 05:28, Geremy L. Hamlett wrote:
>> "date" showes Sun Mar 9 11:24:53 UTC 2003
>
>Your sure that's the right time?
>"date" on my box shows:
>Sun Mar 9 11:22:54 CST 2003
>and since I'm in the Central Time zone, CST is correct.
>
>UTC/GMT is Greenich (sp?) Mean Time. They are 6 hours
>behind us here in the CST zone. So your time stamps
Excuse me but... UTC is 6-hours AHEAD of CST, 5-hours of CDT.
We are 6-hours BEHIND UTC. Look at the timezone info in your
mail headers -- it says -0600 if it doesn't say CST.
Oh, and it's Greenwich, as in, I believe, the location of the
Royal Observatory in England. Longitude zero runs right through it.
UTC and GMT are close enough to be called the same by most people.
-Rusty-
--
_____ Rusty Haddock = KD4WLZ = rusty at fe2o3.lonestar.org
|\/ o \ o
| ( -< O o The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck
|/\__V__/ is the day they start making vacuum cleaners.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list