[NTLUG:Discuss] LVM is cool!

[David Stanaway]

On another thread on this list, there was mention that EVMS supported
LVM1 volumes, and possibly LVM2 volumes.

I have a couple of systems running LVM1, and they work pretty well. I do
worry about what would happen if some of the disks die (I am using
mirrored disks) since the computer is half a world away! 

On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 09:58, Chris Cox wrote:
> LVM is cool.  I just hope we haven't seen the last of a stable
> LVM.  The Sistina stuff is ... well... not working too well..
> apart from certain implementations of LVM1.  The newer LVM2, while
> work is progressing, it has been riddled with bugs and actually
> lacks some features found in LVM1.  (LVM2 is planned for the 2.6
> dists)
> 
> Haven't heard much from the EVMS (IBM's contributed lvm) folks in a
> while... certainly do NOT want to lose LVM support as we move into 2.6.

-- 
David Stanaway <david at stanaway.net>