[NTLUG:Discuss] Linux AntiVirus
kbrannen@gte.net
kbrannen at gte.net
Sat Feb 14 11:02:30 CST 2004
Kyle Davenport wrote:
> From: kbrannen at gte.net
>
>>> As to the question of a Virus or Worm causing problems on a Linux
>>>system, while it's theoretically possible to make a linux virus, in
>>>practice, you will never see one. Part of the problem is most people
>>>don't even know what a virus is, but I will spare y'all the boring
>>>details. This is the best accounting of virus's I came across:
>>>
>>> Linux Windows
>>>Viruses 30 70,000
>>>Worms 70 100,000
>>>Trojans 130 300,000
>>>(Trogans: hard to restrict because a trojan could be defined as any
>>>executable which does something you don't want it to.)
>>>
...
>>Where do the above stats come from? I mean really, 30 viruses for linux?
...
>
> Stats from me. Sorry, I didn't expect an inquisition. I went to some
> trouble (because of a previous argument) to scour the web on this subject.
> I went to all the Virus Software sites, and the security sites, and read
> the best reviews of the issue I could find. I considered their arguments
> and looked at their evidence for linux viruses, worms, etc. So, sorry, no
> links but I was just trying to convince myself. There are so many viruses
> for windows because tiny mutations are enough to make new viruses - all
> they have to do is escape the digital signatures the virus scanners are
> looking for. [ Yet another indication of how insane Window's security is ]
>
> Yes I would like to see that "remote crack" line too.
No inquisition, I'm not Spanish. :-) I was just curious, but then I have a
natural skepticism about stats. If you ever find any links for this, please
post (or send to me); I'd love to see detailed info.
Kevin
More information about the Discuss
mailing list