[NTLUG:Discuss] Wireless Home Network
Kevin Hulse
hulse_kevin at yahoo.com
Thu Jun 24 11:40:15 CDT 2004
--- Steve Baker <sjbaker1 at airmail.net> wrote:
> Kevin Hulse wrote:
>
> > It sounds like you should be using some serious
> SAN
> > hardware for this sort of thing rather than a NAS.
> > What gives?
>
> I'm not familiar with those terms (SAN, NAS)??
Storage Area Network.
A network of storage devices. Most often, Fibre
Channel based networking, using a Fibre Channel
switch between host and storage.
Network Attached Storage.
network attached storage describes any disk type
of storage space that is part of a LAN or WAN
where data is stored on a stand alone device
specifically designed for this purpose
SAN and NAS hardware are conceptually very similar.
However, SAN hardware tends to be somewhat more
"burly". 96G cache on a larger SAN unit is not
at all uncommon.
Fiberchannel also might provide a performance boost
over ethernet.
>
> ---------------------------- Steve Baker
> -------------------------
> HomeEmail: <sjbaker1 at airmail.net> WorkEmail:
> <sjbaker at link.com>
> HomePage : http://www.sjbaker.org
> Projects : http://plib.sf.net
> http://tuxaqfh.sf.net
> http://tuxkart.sf.net
> http://prettypoly.sf.net
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> GCS d-- s:+ a+ C++++$ UL+++$ P--- L++++$ E--- W+++ N
> o+ K? w--- !O M-
> V-- PS++ PE- Y-- PGP-- t+ 5 X R+++ tv b++ DI++ D G+
> e++ h--(-) r+++ y++++
> -----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list