[NTLUG:Discuss] compression and Filesystem question
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.org
Tue Jul 20 16:54:18 CDT 2004
> As it pertains to using cheap IDE drives in SCSI converter trays
Ouch. Not my preferred "reliable" setup but that's just me.
> for offsite storage and nearline archival storage....
Any reason you aren't considering adding a new storage controller like a
3Ware Escalade? Shouldn't really cost anymore than the converters.
> 1.) Is there a file compression file-type that can be mounted as a
> filesystem? Can one mount a tarred.gz?
Use the "conv=auto" option to mount. Not sure if you have to mount it
on loopback.
> What about a compressed ISO? I guess read only would work.
ISO9660 is a pre-mastered filesystem format, so yes, it's largely read-only.
There were tools such as "growfs" that allowed DVD+RW to get around that.
UDF is its replacement which supports both pre-mastered (record) and read/write
(packet write) modes of CD-R/RW. I've been using UDF on Linux with DVD-RAM
since 1998 (back when the drives were $500 for 2.6GB/side ;-).
> 2) Are there any file compression programs that will ABORT and just
> STORE a file if the file compression utility can not compress the file
> by $X%? Didn't/doesn't ZIP compression do something like that?
LZO (lzop) does. It tests the first few blocks for compressor and stores
whole if it does not improve size. Unfortunately I don't see kernel support
for LZO yet, even though it's GPL (but not BSD or LGPL, small note FYI).
> 3) Has anyone ever hot swapped a software raid set? Can it be done?
I recommend LVM when you use MD. LVM stores all sorts of stuff that the
legacy PC BIOS disk label (i.e., Primary/Logical style) cannot.
> How does Linux handle the hot swapping of multiple 'three drive hardware
> RAID-5 disk sets'?
Everytime I've tried to use MD to do such, I dork it up when I test it.
Now that was with the older "raidtools" approach and not the newer
"mdadm", but I typically just use 3Ware Escalade cards these days for any
serious ATA RAID.
--
Linux Enthusiasts call me anti-Linux.
Windows Enthusisats call me anti-Microsoft.
They both must be correct because I have over a
decade of experience with both in mission critical
environments, resulting in a bigotry dedicated to
mitigating risk and focusing on technologies ...
not products or vendors
--------------------------------------------------
Bryan J. Smith, E.I. b.j.smith at ieee.org
More information about the Discuss
mailing list