[NTLUG:Discuss] Re: Lost boot Loader -- a "limited" OS
Bryan J. Smith
b.j.smith at ieee.org
Mon Nov 1 12:34:54 CST 2004
On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 11:51, Chris Cox wrote:
> I agree.. but for a weird reason. This weekend I had to install
> WinXP Pro on a box (blasphemy!)... anyway... it couldn't even find
> the drives... had to interject a set of drivers VIA floppy (WinXP makes
> NO provision for getting the drivers into the installation process
> EXCEPT by floppy!!). Linux in many, many ways is light years ahead
> of WinXP (especially... on installation).
Like the fact that NT5 (2000, XP, 2003) requires an _exact_ registry
setting for the boot-time storage device (let alone the drivers)?
E.g.,
http://lists.leap-cf.org/pipermail/pc_support/2003-August/003891.html
Plus _any_ NT version is incapable of supporting more than one storage
driver at boot-loader time.
No wonder virtualization of Windows (either atop of Linux on
client/server, or mainframe) is becoming very popular!
> I took all day to get the necessary drivers and setup done on the box...
> takes a few minutes to do a Linux install.
And the drivers are far more reliable, _all_ drivers are signed in the
kernel's distribution (either by Linus in stock or the vendor kernel),
etc...
> Floppies aren't dead yet.. well, maybe not as needed on a REAL
> OS... but certainly REQUIRED for Windows.
I personally love the requirement of a DOS or CE boot disk and Microsoft
Network Client for DOS or CE. Microsoft still has _yet_ to produce a
lightweight NT kernel that is bootable from a floppy with network
support.
Talk about a "limited" OS. Those of us who have been working with NT
for years tire of broken promises and lack of focus. .NET/"Longhorn" is
just another Win32/"Cairo" --er, now it's no longer "Longhorn" as
promised but "WinFX Technologies" -- just like no longer "Cairo" as
promised but "Cairo Technologies."
History repeats itself.
--
Bryan J. Smith b.j.smith at ieee.org
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Communities don't have rights. Only individuals in the community
have rights. ... That idea of community rights is firmly rooted
in the 'Communist Manifesto.'" -- Michael Badnarik
More information about the Discuss
mailing list