Whoops... Re: *****POSSIBLE SPAM***** [NTLUG:Discuss] Memtest86 and CPU cache

[Stephen Klein]

Stephen Klein wrote:
> Courtney Grimland wrote:
> 
>> Not exactly Linux-related, but is anyone familiar with memtest86?  
>> When I run it on one particular box, it gives an error every time for 
>> the same address range, no matter what memory stick(s) are in it or 
>> what order they're in.  The address range is fairly close to zero - at 
>> around 6MB out of 768MB.  Is this indicating that the CPU (cache) is 
>> bad?  I know there's not 6MB of cache, but the fact that it's always 
>> the same address range is strange.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
> 
> It's been a while since I used it but there should be an option in 
> memtest86 to disable the cache.  Memtest86 should be taking the cache 
> into consideration, but try that first.
> 
> Sounds like a problem with the motherboard to me.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> https://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 
> 
Sorry, forgot to edit the subject line back to normal.

My ISP got gobbled up by another and so the SPAM filter that worked 
great is no longer available, and apparently the current ISP's SPAM 
filter mistakenly identifies WAY TO MANY legitimate e-mails as SPAM!

I'm not thrilled with the service provided by the new ISP, nor how the 
transistion was handled.  I never recieved the notice until AFTER the 
old dialup service was CUT OFF!  %&%*@$*&*@!!!!!!
.
.
.
Sorry, just a little annoyed right now. >-P

I'm jumping to a broadband provider that just started service in my area 
soon.

Stephen