[NTLUG:Discuss] OT: Apache: Front Page Extensions??
sunflower1043@juno.com
sunflower1043 at juno.com
Mon Nov 1 14:28:05 CST 1999
Hello to all --
This last week, with the idea that maybe the Judge was getting ready to
rule in the Microsoft antitrust case, I was reading the Halloween papers
( this is their 1-year anniversary.) Could Microsoft's "Front Page
Extensions", or their "Active Server Extensions", be part of their effort
which they described in their Halloween paper (
http://www.opensource.org/halloween/ ). In Microsoft's words, following
is an excerpt:
.....
"Beating Linux"
"In addition to the attacking the general weaknesses of
OSS projects (e.g. Integrative / Architectural costs), some specific
attacks on Linux are:"
.....
"Fold extended functionality into commodity protocols / services and
create new protocols"
"Linux's homebase is currently commodity network and server
infrastructure. By folding extended functionality (e.g. Storage+ in file
systems, DAV/POD for networking) into today's commodity services, we
raise the bar & change the rules of the game..."
(end of Microsoft quote)
I am not knowledgeable about any technical server stuff, neither
Microsoft, Apache nor otherwise, so perhaps I am off-base about the
preceding. -- Doug Darnold
*************************************************
Douglas D. Darnold
Principal/ Attorney
LAW OFFICES OF DOUGLAS D. DARNOLD <sunflower1043 at juno.com>
P. O. Box 12461
Dallas Texas 75225-0461
Voice: 214-368-0068
On Sun, 31 Oct 1999 23:39:58 -0600 Alton Pouncey <arpounce at earthlink.net>
writes:
> They are MS "extension" that you install into your web server in
> order for
> FrontPage "bots" to work. IMO they make users lazy in that they
> don't have to
> learn to write cgi's or even learn how to FTP.
>
> I have attempted on numerous occasions to install MS FP extensions
> on Apache
> (actually succeeded once) but after reading a bunch of security
> advisories re:
> FP extensions, I immediately removed them.
>
> My advice is to research any and all advisories you can find re: FP
> extensions
> and make your decision based on security. If that means losing some
> users
> because they want FP functionality but installing FP would
> compromise security,
> so be it. As a former webmaster for an ISP, I absolutely refused to
> compromise
> server security for user convenience. Thankfully, our president was
> a sys.
> admin. by trade and agreed with me and backed me up.
>
> I wish you well in your decision/quest,
> Alton Pouncey
>
> P.S. Here is the URL to a user written howto for installing FP
> (among other
> things) on an Apache web server:
> http://www.faure.de/Apache+SSL+PHP+fp-howto-1p.html
>
> Brian Silvers wrote:
>
> > hey everyone...
> > I have this user who is asking me if our web server supports Front
> Page
> > extensions. What the hell are front page extensions? Anyways I am
> running
> > Apache 1.3.9 on both a WinNT and Linux boxes and was wondering how
> hard this
> > is to do to get apache to recognize whatever these front page
> extensions
> > are. The user sent me 4 links that are either very vague or
> outdated or
> > have nothing to do with the OS's I am running.. Should I even
> bother doing
> > this???
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Brian Silvers Internet Design Specialists in:
> > X-Net Web Systems Cold Fusion, Databases,CGIs,
> > http://www.x-net.com Graphics, Dynamic content, and more!
> > kungfusion at x-net.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > http://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://ntlug.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list