[NTLUG:Discuss] Re: More about kernel recompiling.

[Kyle Davenport]

Chris Cox <cjcox at acm.org> wrote:

> Interesting statement, but lacks validity.  I've seen far more
> corruptions with ext3 than with reiser.  In fact, I have no
> bad resiser installs (and I've been using it for quite some
> time now).  In fact, I believe some recent posts on the this list
> were about a corrupt ext3 journal.
>
> Might be interesting to see how many people have had problems
> with each... but I'd bet that there are more problems with
> ext3 just because of its immaturity.

Oooh!  Filesystem war!

I personally am much more impressed with IBM's jfs.  It is faster and more
stable than reiser or ext3.

I don't know if it's in the main kernel yet, but it's not hard at all to
install.