[NTLUG:Discuss] Re: More about kernel recompiling.

[Chris Cox]

Kyle Davenport wrote:

>Chris Cox <cjcox at acm.org> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Interesting statement, but lacks validity.  I've seen far more
>>corruptions with ext3 than with reiser. 
>>
...snip...

>>
>>Might be interesting to see how many people have had problems
>>with each... but I'd bet that there are more problems with
>>ext3 just because of its immaturity.
>>    
>>
>
>Oooh!  Filesystem war!
>
>I personally am much more impressed with IBM's jfs.  It is faster and more
>stable than reiser or ext3.
>
>I don't know if it's in the main kernel yet, but it's not hard at all to
>install.
>
Since we're on the path.... I hear that XFS, once all of the kinks get 
worked out,
will be the one we'll all eventually want to use.... but that's just 
what I've heard.
I've confused JFS under AIX in the past (gotten it to allocate the same 
physical
data to two separate logical volumes)... but that was many years ago.